The Promise and Peril of Preserving Affordable Housing in Virginia
Affordable housing remains a critical challenge across Virginia and the nation. In the 2025 legislative session, Virginia lawmakers grappled with this issue through HB1973, a bill designed to empower localities with a new tool to preserve existing affordable housing stock. Sponsored primarily by Delegate Elizabeth Bennett-Parker (D-HD-045), the bill aimed to create a framework allowing cities and counties to exercise a right of first refusal on certain publicly supported housing properties when they came up for sale. The core idea was simple yet potentially powerful: give local governments or their designated non-profit partners the first chance to buy these properties, ensuring they remain affordable for at least another 15 years.
LegiEquity analysis projected a significant positive impact, scoring the bill at 80% Positive Impact with high confidence. This positive outlook extended across multiple demographics, including an 80% positive impact score for age groups (both children/youth and older adults), individuals with disabilities (both mental and physical), and racial minorities (specifically Black/Hispanic communities). The bill offered a tangible strategy to combat displacement and maintain community stability, particularly for vulnerable populations often priced out of rapidly gentrifying areas.
A Contentious Path Through the Legislature
The journey of HB1973 began on January 7, 2025, when it was prefiled and referred to the House Committee on General Laws, a committee noted for its significant influence (Power Score: 85.0). The bill defined "publicly supported housing" and outlined the process for localities to adopt an ordinance establishing the right of first refusal. It included provisions for fair market value offers and required annual reporting to the Department of Housing and Community Development.
Delegate Bennett-Parker, with a respectable effectiveness score of 55.0, championed the bill alongside a large contingent of Democratic co-sponsors. However, the path wasn't smooth. On January 20th, the bill was assigned to the Housing/Consumer Protection subcommittee. Ten days later, the subcommittee recommended reporting the bill, but only with a substitute amendment and on a divided vote (5-Y, 3-N). The full General Laws committee followed suit the same day, reporting the substitute bill (25105880D-H1) again on a divided, party-line vote (12-Y, 9-N).
This pattern of division highlighted the lack of bipartisan support for the measure. After clearing procedural hurdles, HB1973 faced its first major floor test in the House of Delegates on February 4th. It passed, but by the slimmest of margins: 50 Yeas to 47 Nays. This tight vote underscored the political contention surrounding government intervention in the housing market, even for preservation purposes.
Senate Passage and the Final Hurdle
Upon arrival in the Senate on February 5th, HB1973 was referred to the Committee on General Laws and Technology, another influential committee (Power Score: 85.0). Echoing the House experience, the committee reported the bill favorably on February 12th, but again with a partisan split (9-Y, 6-N).
After navigating procedural steps and being temporarily passed by, the bill came for a final vote on the Senate floor on February 18th. Mirroring the House result, it passed, but again by a narrow, contentious margin: 21 Yeas to 19 Nays. The voting patterns in both chambers clearly indicated that support fell largely along party lines, with Democrats generally in favor and Republicans largely opposed.
Having successfully passed both the House and Senate, the bill, now designated HB1973ER (Enrolled), was signed by the Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate. On March 11th, it was formally communicated to the Governor's office, awaiting the final signature needed to become law. The deadline for action was set for March 24th.
The Governor's Veto: A Setback for Preservation Efforts
Despite clearing the legislative hurdles and carrying the potential for significant positive community impact as identified by LegiEquity's analysis, HB1973 met its end at the Governor's desk. On March 24, 2025, the Governor vetoed the bill.
This veto effectively halted the creation of this specific affordable housing preservation tool for Virginia localities. While the bill's framework, requiring localities to opt-in via ordinance and guaranteeing fair market value, aimed to balance preservation goals with property rights, the opposition, culminating in the veto, suggests prevailing concerns about government overreach or potential negative impacts on the real estate market.
The story of HB1973 is a stark reminder of the political complexities surrounding housing policy. A bill identified as highly beneficial for diverse and vulnerable populations, sponsored by an effective legislator, and passed by both legislative chambers, ultimately failed to become law due to executive action. Its journey highlights the deep divisions on how best to address the affordable housing crisis, even when focused on preserving existing units rather than solely on new construction. The debate over tools like the right of first refusal continues in Virginia and other states facing similar housing pressures.
LegiEquity analyzes proposed legislation to determine its potential impact on various demographic groups. Our goal is to provide objective insights into how laws may affect different communities.
Related Articles
You might also be interested in these articles